Applicant Evaluation Form 2011 (Sample)

To ensure that our information is accurate, please fill in each section of the Project Information section.

Applicant Information
Applicant Name
Application Number
Reviewer Name

To appropriately evaluate each section below, read the Applicant Evaluation Criteria, which clearly describes what the Centre is looking for in each of the 10 areas listed below (this document can be downloaded from the portal page).
Complete each section below by:
  • Selecting the appropriate rating for each question
Applicant Evaluation
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Unable
to Judge
1. Background information and knowledge
2. Clear project goals and objectives
3. Methodology design and approach
4. Clear delineation of outcomes and deliverables
5. Appropriate plan
6. Appropriate timelines
7. Team (expertise is clear)
8. Budget is justified and appropriate
9. Clarity of proposal
10. Innovative project

Overall Evaluation
Rating
Overall Evaluation

Please note: Overall ratings of:

  • less than 3 will not be recommended for funding
  • above 3+ may be recommended for funding
  • actual funding of projects depends on funding
    available per fiscal year

Use the following scale to rate the project’s overall rating:

0.0 – 1.9 Serious flaws
2.0 – 2.5 Needs major revision
2.6 – 2.9 Needs revision
3.0 – 3.4 Adequate research
3.5 – 3.9 Very Good
4.0 – 4.4 Excellent
4.5 – 5.0 Outstanding

Relevance Evaluation
Rating
Priority Evaluation
Please note: your rating must address the overall submission
rather than relevance of the problem area identified
throughout your review.

Use the following scale to rate the project’s direct relevance to UWGT Priorities:

0.0 – 0.9 Not Relevant
1.0 – 1.9 Limited Relevance
2.0 – 2.9 Tenuous Relevance
3.0 – 3.9 Relevant
4.0 – 5.0 Extremely Relevant


Reviewer Comments

In the text box below please paste your written review, beginning with a brief summary of the proposed project. Provide an evaluation that specifically addresses each of the ten (10) areas listed above in the Applicant Evaluation section, the use of headings to organize your review will be helpful to others reading reviewer comments. At the end of your review, please summarize by addressing the projects most significant strengths and weaknesses. Please note: applicants will receive a copy of all peer reviews.

Reviewer Comments: